These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 26888657

  • 1. Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentre European study.
    Reif P, Schott S, Boyon C, Richter J, Kavšek G, Timoh KN, Haas J, Pateisky P, Griesbacher A, Lang U, Ayres-de-Campos D.
    BJOG; 2016 Dec; 123(13):2208-2217. PubMed ID: 26888657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians' interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph.
    Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J.
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):978-84. PubMed ID: 21609381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P, Machado AP, Monteiro S, Costa A, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, Ayres-De-Campos D.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
    Ignatov P, Atanasov B.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012 Oct; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D, Lalor J.
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Umbilical artery velocimetry may influence clinical interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograms.
    Almström H, Axelsson O, Ekman G, Ingemarsson I, Maesel A, Arström K, Marsál K.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Aug; 74(7):526-9. PubMed ID: 7618450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S, Heinis AM, Vandenbussche F, van Drongelen J, van Dillen J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation.
    Uccella S, Cromi A, Colombo G, Agosti M, Bogani G, Casarin J, Ghezzi F.
    BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1657-64. PubMed ID: 23061674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study.
    Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, SisPorto Multicentre Validation Study Group.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jan 10; 118(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 15596273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Continuous monitoring of fetal oxygen saturation (FSpO2) using intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (IFPO) in the diagnosis of acute fetal hypoxia].
    Roztocil A, Miklica J, Kucera M, Ventruba P.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2000 Jul 10; 65(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 11039226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
    Kundu S, Kuehnle E, Schippert C, von Ehr J, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov 10; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A, van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW, Veerman J, Dekkers AH, Visser GH.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun 10; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Access to computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians' prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH.
    Costa A, Santos C, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa C, Bernardes J.
    BJOG; 2010 Sep 10; 117(10):1288-93. PubMed ID: 20618316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Role of pathological cardiotocography in evaluating fetal well-being.
    Shiekh SM, Kamruddin A, Setna F, Riaz T.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 Jun 10; 16(6):404-7. PubMed ID: 16787617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
    Westerhuis ME, Moons KG, van Beek E, Bijvoet SM, Drogtrop AP, van Geijn HP, van Lith JM, Mol BW, Nijhuis JG, Oei SG, Porath MM, Rijnders RJ, Schuitemaker NW, van der Tweel I, Visser GH, Willekes C, Kwee A.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul 26; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003 Jul 26; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A, Chandraharan E.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan 26; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.