These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

482 related items for PubMed ID: 26905531

  • 1. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW, Camarota K, Harris FP, Dean J.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS, Galster JA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
    Pittman AL, Lewis DE, Hoover BM, Stelmachowicz PG.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A, Iglehart F.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B, Debener S, Schmidt J, Jaeger M, Neher T.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS, Fausel N, Liskow C, Chobot J.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modeling the Influence of Acoustic Coupling of Hearing Aids on FM Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
    Norrix LW, Van Tasell D, Ross J, Harris FP, Dean J.
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 24(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 25651525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M, Oeding K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit.
    Keidser G, Dillon H, Convery E, Mejia J.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(10):955-68. PubMed ID: 24384081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J, Duke M, Schafer E, Jones C, Rakita L, Battles J.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jan; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F, Jackson A, Keenan D, Lau CC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H, Maj JB, Soede W, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT, Valente M, Oeding K, Kallogjeri D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM, Mills KET, Humphrey E, Yeager KR, Jones E, McElligott K, Pierce A, Agrawal S, Froeling C, Little JP.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.