These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


515 related items for PubMed ID: 26907794

  • 1. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
    Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, Gallagher R.
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
    Sushames A, Edwards A, Thompson F, McDermott R, Gebel K.
    PLoS One; 2016 Sep; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
    Chu AH, Ng SH, Paknezhad M, Gauterin A, Koh D, Brown MS, Müller-Riemenschneider F.
    PLoS One; 2017 Sep; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
    St-Laurent A, Mony MM, Mathieu MÈ, Ruchat SM.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
    Ferguson T, Rowlands AV, Olds T, Maher C.
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar 27; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Different Physical Activity Measures in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Prospective Study.
    Alharbi M, Bauman A, Alabdulaali M, Neubeck L, Smith S, Naismith S, Jeon YH, Tofler G, Surour A, Gallagher R.
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb 19; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT, Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Montoye AH.
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul 19; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.
    Mikkelsen MK, Berg-Beckhoff G, Frederiksen P, Horgan G, O'Driscoll R, Palmeira AL, Scott SE, Stubbs J, Heitmann BL, Larsen SC.
    PLoS One; 2020 Jul 19; 15(6):e0234426. PubMed ID: 32525912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.