These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
96 related items for PubMed ID: 2691796
1. Screening urines for bacteriuria. Stevens M. Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jul; 46(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 2691796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Data on a comparison between a rapid test and urine culture for the determination of bacteriuria]. Peretti P, Zurlini C, Ghinelli P, Colombrita D. Minerva Med; 1978 Apr 28; 69(20):1375-82. PubMed ID: 662163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines. Appelbaum PC, Olmstead CC. Med Microbiol Immunol; 1982 Apr 28; 170(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 7043229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How effective are screening tests for microalbuminuria in random urine specimens? Lum G. Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2000 Oct 28; 30(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 11045765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of microscopic examination for bacteriuria. Yu HD. Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Xue Za Zhi; 1978 Mar 28; 11(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 357101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mass screening for bacteriuria in students]. Wachtel D. Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1979 Jun 01; 34(11):318-9. PubMed ID: 382655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [ABACTO-SCREEN: a new system for the rapid screening of bacteriuria. Evaluation of the precision versus the traditional methods and compared with the Abbott MS-2]. Allocca F, Campolmi M, Guarnieri M, Verdiani S, Alegente G. Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1987 Sep 01; 23(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 3332379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Uricult. A simple method of semiquantitative urine culture]. Haahr J, Bohn L. Ugeskr Laeger; 1970 Jul 16; 132(29):1360-2. PubMed ID: 4915910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Subnormal urinary glucose as a determination technic for genuine significant bacteriuria]. Varga B, Veszelovszky I, Papp-Juhász N, Polgár A. Z Urol Nephrol; 1972 Dec 16; 65(12):927-32. PubMed ID: 4579602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quantitative titration method of determining massive bacteriuria for daily application]. Kaplan AE. Lab Delo; 1979 Dec 16; (5):274-7. PubMed ID: 86644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Incidence, age and sex distribution in bacteriuria. Recent epidemiologic study]. Lison AE, Seibt H, Losse H. Med Welt; 1975 Sep 19; 26(38):1726-7. PubMed ID: 1102832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of bacteriuria by detection of volatile organic compounds in urine using an automated headspace analyzer with multiple conducting polymer sensors. Aathithan S, Plant JC, Chaudry AN, French GL. J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul 19; 39(7):2590-3. PubMed ID: 11427574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: urinalysis versus urine culture. Chongsomchai C, Piansriwatchara E, Lumbiganon P, Pianthaweechai K. J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr 19; 82(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 10410499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnancy diagnosis and bacteriuria. Murray ED. J R Coll Gen Pract; 1980 Oct 19; 30(219):634. PubMed ID: 7452607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bacteriuria and pregnancy. I. Assessment of a rapid chemical screening method for demonstration of significant bacteriuria]. Vejlsgaard R, Fischer-Rasmussen W. Ugeskr Laeger; 1969 Mar 27; 131(13):553-4. PubMed ID: 4893794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Can we rely on the results of urine microscopy and culture when tests are performed in general practice?]. Bjerrum L, Grinsted P, Søgaard P. Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr 01; 164(14):1927-30. PubMed ID: 11957428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of four recent techniques for screening urines for the presence of significant numbers of bacteria. Wright LA. J Med Lab Technol; 1968 Oct 01; 25(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 4883570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]