These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

700 related items for PubMed ID: 26918298

  • 1. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D, Drevin L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Robinson D, Bratt O, Loeb S, Stattin P, Egevad L.
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Nerstrøm C, Røder MA, Iversen P, Toft BG, Vainer B, Brasso K.
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA.
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Uemura H, Hoshino K, Sasaki T, Miyoshi Y, Ishiguro H, Inayama Y, Kubota Y.
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.
    Danneman D, Drevin L, Robinson D, Stattin P, Egevad L.
    BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 24552193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT, Schieda N, El Hallani S, Breau RH, Morash C, Robertson SJ, Mai KT, Belanger EC, Flood TA.
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings.
    Steinberg DM, Sauvageot J, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI.
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 May; 21(5):566-76. PubMed ID: 9158682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Gianduzzo T, Coughlin G, Duffy D, LeFevre I, Johannsen S, Egevad L, Yaxley J.
    Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM, Casey RG, Hong MK, Pedersen J, Connolly S, Peters J, Harewood L, Gleave ME, Costello AJ, Hovens CM, Goldenberg SL.
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Faraj SF, Bezerra SM, Yousefi K, Fedor H, Glavaris S, Han M, Partin AW, Humphreys E, Tosoian J, Johnson MH, Davicioni E, Trock BJ, Schaeffer EM, Ross AE, Netto GJ.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jul; 11(1):e0146189. PubMed ID: 26731672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
    Grogan J, Gupta R, Mahon KL, Stricker PD, Haynes AM, Delprado W, Turner J, Horvath LG, Kench JG.
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Gleason scores from sextant prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Altay B, Kefi A, Nazli O, Killi R, Semerci B, Akar I.
    Urol Int; 2001 Nov; 67(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11464109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
    Offermann A, Hohensteiner S, Kuempers C, Ribbat-Idel J, Schneider F, Becker F, Hupe MC, Duensing S, Merseburger AS, Kirfel J, Reischl M, Lubczyk V, Kuefer R, Perner S.
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2017 Nov; 4():157. PubMed ID: 29034236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
    Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI.
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.