These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


668 related items for PubMed ID: 26928002

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller SE, Zhang Y, Nelson PB.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 26609904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A, Serman M, Gefeller O, Hoppe U.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.
    Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Nicol T.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Mar; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
    Turgeon C, Lazzouni L, Lepore F, Ellemberg D.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y, Tetin-Schneider S, Hildesheimer M, Kishon-Rabin L.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Apr; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM, Debruyne JA, Chenault MN, Francart T, Brokx JP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Apr; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A, Layer N, Meister H, Müller V, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Sandmann P.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.