These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

348 related items for PubMed ID: 26932789

  • 1. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM.
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar 01; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson P.
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec 23; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study.
    Ewald H, Klerings I, Wagner G, Heise TL, Stratil JM, Lhachimi SK, Hemkens LG, Gartlehner G, Armijo-Olivo S, Nussbaumer-Streit B.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep 23; 149():154-164. PubMed ID: 35654269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The NICE UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid): Post-development study to further evaluate precision and number-needed-to-read when retrieving UK evidence.
    Ayiku L, Levay P, Hudson T, Finnegan A.
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep 23; 11(5):669-677. PubMed ID: 32618106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?
    Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K.
    Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun 23; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study.
    Eybye MN, Madsen SD, Schultz ANØ, Nim CG.
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2022 Dec 19; 30(1):57. PubMed ID: 36536437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses.
    Slobogean GP, Verma A, Giustini D, Slobogean BL, Mulpuri K.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec 19; 62(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 19364634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D, Kirk S.
    PLoS One; 2015 Dec 19; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.
    Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug 10; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Giustini D, Boulos MN.
    Online J Public Health Inform; 2013 Aug 10; 5(2):214. PubMed ID: 23923099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.