These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
175 related items for PubMed ID: 26946915
1. Comparative in vitro study of cementing techniques for implant-supported restorations. Liang T, Hu X, Zhu L, Pan X, Zhou Y, Liu J. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26946915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method. Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations. Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Hess T, Zhang H, Chung KH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Apr; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations. Jimenez RA, Vargas-Koudriavtsev T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Apr; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial. Canullo L, Cocchetto R, Marinotti F, Oltra DP, Diago MP, Loi I. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cemented implant restoration: A technique for minimizing adverse biologic consequences. Galván G, Kois JC, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois D. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 26119018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area. Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM. J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations. Al Amri MD, Al-Johany SS, Al-Qarni MN, Al-Bakri AS, Al-Maflehi NS, Abualsaud HS. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents. Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Feb; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations. Wadhwani C, Chung KH. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns. Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jun; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study. Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins. Rayyan MM, Makarem HA. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):840-842. PubMed ID: 27460328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA. J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns. Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Al-Bakri AS, Al-Qarni MN. J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant-supported restorations?: An in vitro study. Gönder A, Polat S, Kılıçarslan MA, Ocak M, Tamam E. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):807-814. PubMed ID: 37232125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings. Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S. J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cementing an Implant Crown: A Novel Measurement System Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach. Wadhwani C, Goodwin S, Chung KH. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 25196982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]