These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

613 related items for PubMed ID: 26946916

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hasanzade M, Aminikhah M, Afrashtehfar KI, Alikhasi M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 32928518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H, Kılınç HI, Albayrak H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of single-unit ceramic crown fabrication after digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manisha J, Srivastava G, Das SS, Tabarak N, Choudhury GK.
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023 May; 23(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37102534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In Vitro Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Accuracy of Different Types of Dental Ceramic Restorations Fabricated Based on Digital and Conventional Impressions.
    Özsürmeli H, Türker ŞB.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021 May; 34(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 33570521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.