These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
805 related items for PubMed ID: 26948781
1. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J, Büehren T. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry. Li J, Chen H, Savini G, Lu W, Yu X, Bao F, Wang Q, Huang J. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients. Ghaffari R, Mahmoudzadeh R, Mohammadi SS, Salabati M, Latifi G, Ghassemi H. Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, Puttaiah NK, Haria D, J TS, Thakkar MM. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):577-81. PubMed ID: 27113881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Chen H, Lu W, Hu Q, Bao F, Wang Q. Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Fişuş AD, Hirnschall ND, Ruiss M, Pilwachs C, Georgiev S, Findl O. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct 01; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. Kanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Rozema JJ, Przewłócka K, Savini G. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov 01; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P, Almendral-Gómez J, Garzón N, Ruiz-Medrano J, Fernández-Pérez C, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D. Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar 01; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters. Ferrer-Blasco T, Domínguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Aloy MA, Adsuara JE, Montés-Micó R. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb 01; 255(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 27900479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes. Shen P, Zheng Y, Ding X, Liu B, Congdon N, Morgan I, He M. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb 01; 39(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 23228592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer. Yu J, Zhao G, Lei CS, Wan T, Ning R, Xing W, Ma X, Pan H, Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Zhou X, Huang J. Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May 21; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients. Chan TCY, Wan KH, Tang FY, Wang YM, Yu M, Cheung C. Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan 21; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers. Yeu E. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug 21; 45(8):1130-1134. PubMed ID: 31279621 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparision of two new optical biometry devices with an ultrasonic immersion biometer]. Chiseliţă D, Cantemir A, Gălăţanu C, Irod A. Oftalmologia; 2011 Aug 21; 55(4):104-10. PubMed ID: 22642145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Grulkowski I, Liu JJ, Zhang JY, Potsaid B, Jayaraman V, Cable AE, Duker JS, Fujimoto JG. Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov 21; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]