These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

261 related items for PubMed ID: 26949761

  • 1. 3D quantification of clinical marginal and internal gap of porcelain laminate veneers with minimal and without tooth preparation and 2-year clinical evaluation.
    Karagözoğlu İ, Toksavul S, Toman M.
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(6):461-71. PubMed ID: 26949761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Heat-Pressed and CAD/CAM Porcelain Laminate Veneers and a 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Yuce M, Ulusoy M, Turk AG.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29271526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Maxillary Anterior Single All-Ceramic Crowns and 2-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Akın A, Toksavul S, Toman M.
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 25220298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Edelmann K.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jul; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years.
    D'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1071-9. PubMed ID: 21773711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers.
    Dhawan P, Prakash H, Shah N.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 15328996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers on Teeth with Different Preparation Depths.
    Tuğcu E, Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan YK, Aslan YU.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018 Aug; 38(Suppl):s87–s95. PubMed ID: 29513770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements.
    Al-Dwairi ZN, Alkhatatbeh RM, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 30391059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adhesively restored anterior maxillary dentitions affected by severe erosion: up to 6-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Vailati F, Gruetter L, Belser UC.
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 8(4):506-30. PubMed ID: 24624375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
    Guess PC, Stappert CF.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers.
    Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Morimoto S.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013 Jun; 33(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 23342345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Self-adhesive Luting of Partial Ceramic Crowns: Selective Enamel Etching Leads to Higher Survival after 6.5 Years In Vivo.
    Baader K, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Schmalz G, Federlin M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2016 Jun; 18(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 26891618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results.
    Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, Mohamed SE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 23031727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro.
    Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH.
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 22198195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study.
    Celik C, Gemalmaz D.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 15(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11887601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study.
    Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15736774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of conventional ceramic laminate veneers, partial laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations in fracture strength after aging.
    Gresnigt MMM, Sugii MM, Johanns KBFW, van der Made SAM.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104172. PubMed ID: 33172798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F, Moosavi H, Shahriari R, Sarabi N, Shayankhah T.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May 01; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation.
    Kim JH, Cho BH, Lee JH, Kwon SJ, Yi YA, Shin Y, Roh BD, Seo DG.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb 01; 73(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 25299600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.