These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


159 related items for PubMed ID: 26958710

  • 1. GPCR-Bench: A Benchmarking Set and Practitioners' Guide for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Docking.
    Weiss DR, Bortolato A, Tehan B, Mason JS.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Apr 25; 56(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 26958710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Benchmarking the performance of MM/PBSA in virtual screening enrichment using the GPCR-Bench dataset.
    Yau MQ, Emtage AL, Loo JSE.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Nov 25; 34(11):1133-1145. PubMed ID: 32851579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.
    Chan WKB, Zhang Y.
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Aug 07; 432(17):4872-4890. PubMed ID: 32652079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Docking and Virtual Screening Strategies for GPCR Drug Discovery.
    Beuming T, Lenselink B, Pala D, McRobb F, Repasky M, Sherman W.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015 Aug 07; 1335():251-76. PubMed ID: 26260606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL, Castleman PN, Sears CK, Wink LH, Cole JA, Baker DL, Parrill AL.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct 07; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening.
    Tran-Nguyen VK, Jacquemard C, Rognan D.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep 28; 60(9):4263-4273. PubMed ID: 32282202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Novel approach for efficient pharmacophore-based virtual screening: method and applications.
    Dror O, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct 28; 49(10):2333-43. PubMed ID: 19803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J, Desaphy J, Rognan D.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct 27; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise.
    Politi R, Convertino M, Popov K, Dokholyan NV, Tropsha A.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun 27; 56(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 27050767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S, Huey R, Pique ME, Sanner MF, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ.
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May 27; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
    Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Nov 16; 49(23):6789-801. PubMed ID: 17154509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.