These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

560 related items for PubMed ID: 26966721

  • 1. The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?
    Comiter CV, Dobberfuhl AD.
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 26966721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?
    Comiter C.
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Feb; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 25558839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Severe postprostatectomy incontinence: Is there an association between preoperative urodynamic findings and outcome of incontinence surgery?
    Holm HV, Fosså SD, Hedlund H, Schultz A, Dahl AA.
    Scand J Urol; 2015 Jun; 49(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 25428752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?].
    Gerhard JF, Aragona MS, Olianas R.
    Urologe A; 2017 Dec; 56(12):1559-1571. PubMed ID: 29170788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Surgical Treatment of Male Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Current Concepts.
    Kretschmer A, Nitti V.
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):364-376. PubMed ID: 29174616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Constable L, Cotterill N, Cooper D, Glazener C, Drake MJ, Forrest M, Harding C, Kilonzo M, MacLennan G, McCormack K, McDonald A, Mundy A, Norrie J, Pickard R, Ramsay C, Smith R, Wileman S, Abrams P, (Chief Investigator) for the MASTER Study Group.
    Trials; 2018 Feb 21; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. AdVance/AdVance XP transobturator male slings: preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome.
    Collado Serra A, Resel Folkersma L, Domínguez-Escrig JL, Gómez-Ferrer A, Rubio-Briones J, Solsona Narbón E.
    Urology; 2013 May 21; 81(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 23465151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The use of sling vs sphincter in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.
    Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Van der Aa F.
    BJU Int; 2015 Sep 21; 116(3):330-42. PubMed ID: 25382641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of clinical outcomes between "ideal" and "nonideal" transobturator male sling patients for treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence.
    Sturm RM, Guralnick ML, Stone AR, Bales GT, Dangle PP, O'Connor RC.
    Urology; 2014 May 21; 83(5):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24767526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup.
    Giberti C, Gallo F, Schenone M, Cortese P, Ninotta G.
    J Urol; 2009 May 21; 181(5):2204-8. PubMed ID: 19296976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.