These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

340 related items for PubMed ID: 26972545

  • 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method.
    Schnutenhaus S, Edelmann C, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Apr; 121(4):e72-9. PubMed ID: 26972545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
    Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Schnutenhaus S, Gröller S, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
    Pettersson A, Kero T, Söderberg R, Näsström K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II).
    Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, Schlegel KA, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 19939691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
    Zhao XZ, Xu WH, Tang ZH, Wu MJ, Zhu J, Chen S.
    Chin J Dent Res; 2014 Apr; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, Schutyser F, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
    Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, Cannas B, Fäldt J, Söderberg R, Näsström K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of a newly developed open-source system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T, Tandon D, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Mischkowski RA, Scheer M, Zöller JE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jun; 27(1):128-37. PubMed ID: 22299089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A, Álvarez Del Canto O.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015 Jun; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
    Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
    Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jul; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A retrospective study of the accuracy of template-guided versus freehand implant placement: A nonradiologic method.
    Alevizakos V, Mitov G, Stoetzer M, von See C.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 128(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31227455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, Zöller JE.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.