These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 26985683

  • 1. Numerical assessment of the reduction of specific absorption rate by adding high dielectric materials for fetus MRI at 3 T.
    Luo M, Hu C, Zhuang Y, Chen W, Liu F, Xin SX.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Aug 01; 61(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 26985683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A simulation study on the effect of optimized high permittivity materials on fetal imaging at 3T.
    van Gemert J, Brink W, Remis R, Webb A.
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Nov 01; 82(5):1822-1831. PubMed ID: 31199014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy.
    Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV.
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Apr 01; 55(4):883-93. PubMed ID: 16508913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. High dielectric material in MRI: Numerical assessment of the reduction of the induced local power on implanted cardiac leads.
    Mattei E, Lucano E, Censi F, Angelone LM, Calcagnini G.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug 01; 2016():2361-2364. PubMed ID: 28324965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. RF-EMF exposure of fetus and mother during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Pediaditis M, Leitgeb N, Cech R.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec 21; 53(24):7187-95. PubMed ID: 19033645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A novel method to decrease electric field and SAR using an external high dielectric sleeve at 3 T head MRI: numerical and experimental results.
    Park BS, Rajan SS, Guag JW, Angelone LM.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Apr 21; 62(4):1063-9. PubMed ID: 25347873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electromagnetic simulation of RF burn injuries occurring at skin-skin and skin-bore wall contact points in an MRI scanner with a birdcage coil.
    Tang M, Okamoto K, Haruyama T, Yamamoto T.
    Phys Med; 2021 Feb 21; 82():219-227. PubMed ID: 33657471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparative numerical study of rotating and stationary RF coils in terms of flip angle and specific absorption rate for 7 T MRI.
    Trakic A, Jin J, Li MY, McClymont D, Weber E, Liu F, Crozier S.
    J Magn Reson; 2013 Nov 21; 236():70-82. PubMed ID: 24076497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. B1 field, SAR, and SNR comparisons for birdcage, TEM, and microstrip coils at 7T.
    Wang C, Shen GX.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Aug 21; 24(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 16786582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Parallel transmit excitation at 1.5 T based on the minimization of a driving function for device heating.
    Gudino N, Sonmez M, Yao Z, Baig T, Nielles-Vallespin S, Faranesh AZ, Lederman RJ, Martens M, Balaban RS, Hansen MS, Griswold MA.
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan 21; 42(1):359-71. PubMed ID: 25563276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Local SAR management strategies to use two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3 T.
    Yetisir F, Abaci Turk E, Adalsteinsson E, Wald LL, Grant PE.
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 Mar 21; 91(3):1165-1178. PubMed ID: 37929768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Safety and imaging performance of two-channel RF shimming for fetal MRI at 3T.
    Yetisir F, Abaci Turk E, Guerin B, Gagoski BA, Grant PE, Adalsteinsson E, Wald LL.
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Nov 21; 86(5):2810-2821. PubMed ID: 34240759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What MRI Sequences Produce the Highest Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), and Is There Something We Should Be Doing to Reduce the SAR During Standard Examinations?
    Allison J, Yanasak N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug 21; 205(2):W140. PubMed ID: 26204302
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. RF safety assessment of a bilateral four-channel transmit/receive 7 Tesla breast coil: SAR versus tissue temperature limits.
    Fiedler TM, Ladd ME, Bitz AK.
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan 21; 44(1):143-157. PubMed ID: 28102957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure.
    Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb 21; 55(4):913-30. PubMed ID: 20090188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kikuchi S, Saito K, Takahashi M, Ito K.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr 21; 55(8):2411-26. PubMed ID: 20360633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 7 T body MRI: B1 shimming with simultaneous SAR reduction.
    van den Bergen B, Van den Berg CA, Bartels LW, Lagendijk JJ.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 07; 52(17):5429-41. PubMed ID: 17762096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. SAR exposure from UHF RFID reader in adult, child, pregnant woman, and fetus anatomical models.
    Fiocchi S, Markakis IA, Ravazzani P, Samaras T.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Sep 07; 34(6):443-52. PubMed ID: 23613336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil. Specific energy absorption rate.
    Collins CM, Li S, Smith MB.
    Magn Reson Med; 1998 Dec 07; 40(6):847-56. PubMed ID: 9840829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reducing SAR and enhancing cerebral signal-to-noise ratio with high permittivity padding at 3 T.
    Yang QX, Wang J, Wang J, Collins CM, Wang C, Smith MB.
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Feb 07; 65(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 21264928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.