These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
191 related items for PubMed ID: 2700408
1. [The use of modern ceramics for inlays and onlays]. Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H, Manhartsberger C. Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 2700408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Otto T, Schneider D. Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Magne P, Belser UC. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preparations for Cerec inlays, onlays, and partial crowns. Hansen S. Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 11373734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical long-term success of ceramic restorations--Part I: Inlays and onlays. Blatz M. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 16(9):622. PubMed ID: 15597524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I, Ergun G, Uctasli S, Lassila LV. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2003 May; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M. J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Glass ceramic inlays-onlays: toward a new form of restorative dentistry]. Knellesen C, Degrange M. Cah Prothese; 1987 Dec; 15(60):149-63. PubMed ID: 3329557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]