These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ, Liu Y, HEI Health Review Committee. Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The empirical correlations between PM2.5, PM10 and AOD in the Beijing metropolitan region and the PM2.5, PM10 distributions retrieved by MODIS. Kong L, Xin J, Zhang W, Wang Y. Environ Pollut; 2016 Sep; 216():350-360. PubMed ID: 27294786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of fossil-fuel power plant emissions on the surface fine particulate matter in the Seoul Capital Area, South Korea. Kim BU, Kim O, Kim HC, Kim S. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):863-73. PubMed ID: 27389997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Satellite-based high-resolution PM2.5 estimation over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China using an improved geographically and temporally weighted regression model. He Q, Huang B. Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():1027-1037. PubMed ID: 29455919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating PM2.5 in Xi'an, China using aerosol optical depth: a comparison between the MODIS and MISR retrieval models. You W, Zang Z, Pan X, Zhang L, Chen D. Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb 01; 505():1156-65. PubMed ID: 25466686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A nonparametric approach to filling gaps in satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth for estimating ambient PM2.5 levels. Zhang R, Di B, Luo Y, Deng X, Grieneisen ML, Wang Z, Yao G, Zhan Y. Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec 01; 243(Pt B):998-1007. PubMed ID: 30248607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Estimation of PM2.5 over eastern China from MODIS aerosol optical depth using the back propagation neural network]. Guo JP, Wu YR, Zhang XY, Li XW. Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Mar 01; 34(3):817-25. PubMed ID: 23745382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ground based indices (API and AQI) with satellite based aerosol products. Zheng S, Cao CX, Singh RP. Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug 01; 488-489():398-412. PubMed ID: 24412562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Four Ground-Level PM2.5 Estimation Models Using PARASOL Aerosol Optical Depth Data from China. Guo H, Cheng T, Gu X, Chen H, Wang Y, Zheng F, Xiang K. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jan 30; 13(2):180. PubMed ID: 26840329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term trends in ambient fine particulate matter from 1980 to 2016 in United Arab Emirates. Al-Taani AA, Nazzal Y, Howari FM, Yousef A. Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Feb 08; 191(3):143. PubMed ID: 30734105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]