These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
413 related items for PubMed ID: 27054866
1. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study. Aradya A, Kumar UK, Chowdhary R. Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA, Geramy A, Yaghobee S, Khorsand A, Yousefifakhr H, Rokn A, Soolari A. J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. Liu S, Tang C, Yu J, Dai W, Bao Y, Hu D. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Khurana P, Sharma A, Sodhi KK. J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 21905886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC, Anchieta RB, de Vargas LC, Kina S, França FM. J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of stress distributions at the implant-abutment complex and peri-implant bone around mandibular dental implants with different neck geometries and inclinations. Dinc MM, Turkoglu P, Selvi F. Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 34098780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads. Álvarez-Arenal Á, Segura-Mori L, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, DeLlanos-Lanchares H, Sanchez-Lasheras F, Ellacuria-Echevarria J. Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26943357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Martini AP, Barros RM, Júnior AC, Rocha EP, de Almeida EO, Ferraz CC, Pellegrin MC, Anchieta RB. J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 23110305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models. Yamanishi Y, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S, Nakano T, Yatani H. J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study. Paul S, Padmanabhan TV, Swarup S. Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Sep; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Mismatches on Stress Distribution: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Study. Esfahanian V, Khosravi A, Ketabi M, Deporter D. J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct 01; 48(5):370-374. PubMed ID: 34965305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]