These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 27060397

  • 21. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L, Fenwick J, Butt J.
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A state-wide review of hospital postnatal care in Victoria, Australia: the views and experiences of midwives.
    Rayner JA, Forster D, McLachlan H, Yelland J, Davey MA.
    Midwifery; 2008 Sep; 24(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 17270326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K, Kornelsen J.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Nurse-midwives' experiences with planned home birth: impact on attitudes and practice.
    Vedam S, Stoll K, White S, Aaker J, Schummers L.
    Birth; 2009 Dec; 36(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 20002419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Change in practice: a qualitative exploration of midwives' and doctors' views about the introduction of STan monitoring in an Australian hospital.
    Mayes ME, Wilkinson C, Kuah S, Matthews G, Turnbull D.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb 17; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 29454359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Publicly-funded homebirth models in Australia.
    Catling-Paull C, Foureur MJ, Homer CS.
    Women Birth; 2012 Dec 17; 25(4):152-8. PubMed ID: 22104264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.
    Edvardsson K, Mogren I, Lalos A, Persson M, Small R.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug 27; 15():195. PubMed ID: 26311437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Predictors of midwives' intention to provide planned home birth services to low-risk women: A theory of planned behaviour approach.
    Muhammed A, Khuan L, Shariff-Ghazali S, Said SM, Hassan M.
    Midwifery; 2019 Jun 27; 73():62-68. PubMed ID: 30884373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Community midwives' views and experience of home birth.
    Floyd L.
    Midwifery; 1995 Mar 27; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7731374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.
    Catling-Paull C, Coddington RL, Foureur MJ, Homer CS, Birthplace in Australia Study, National Publicly-funded Homebirth Consortium.
    Med J Aust; 2013 Jun 17; 198(11):616-20. PubMed ID: 23919710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of an in-situ simulation workshop on home birth practice in Australia.
    Kumar A, Wallace EM, Smith C, Nestel D.
    Women Birth; 2019 Aug 17; 32(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 30220576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Simulation based training in a publicly funded home birth programme in Australia: A qualitative study.
    Kumar A, Nestel D, Stoyles S, East C, Wallace EM, White C.
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb 17; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 26321188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
    Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C, Gordon W, Hannibal D, Vedam S.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014 Feb 17; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Care providers' views and experiences of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria, Australia.
    Rayner JA, McLachlan HL, Peters L, Forster DA.
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun 17; 29(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 23123157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth.
    Cheyne H, Abhyankar P, McCourt C.
    Midwifery; 2013 Oct 17; 29(10):1110-21. PubMed ID: 23968777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Birthplace in Australia: Processes and interactions during the intrapartum transfer of women from planned homebirth to hospital.
    Fox D, Sheehan A, Homer C.
    Midwifery; 2018 Feb 17; 57():18-25. PubMed ID: 29144977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women at a public hospital in Australia.
    Carolan-Olah M, Kruger G, Garvey-Graham A.
    Midwifery; 2015 Jan 17; 31(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 25132098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Home birth in North America: attitudes and practice of US certified nurse-midwives and Canadian registered midwives.
    Vedam S, Stoll K, Schummers L, Rogers J, Paine LL.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014 Jan 17; 59(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 24165202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Task shifting Midwifery Support Workers as the second health worker at a home birth in the UK: A qualitative study.
    Taylor B, Henshall C, Goodwin L, Kenyon S.
    Midwifery; 2018 Jul 17; 62():109-115. PubMed ID: 29665522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.