These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 27066777

  • 1. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals.
    Lawton J, Snowdon C, Morrow S, Norman JE, Denison FC, Hallowell N.
    Trials; 2016 Apr 11; 17():195. PubMed ID: 27066777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting.
    Lawton J, Hallowell N, Snowdon C, Norman JE, Carruthers K, Denison FC.
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May 24; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 28539111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Women's views and experiences of two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study.
    Sawyer A, Chhoa C, Ayers S, Pushpa-Rajah A, Duley L.
    Trials; 2017 Sep 09; 18(1):422. PubMed ID: 28886747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study.
    Chhoa CY, Sawyer A, Ayers S, Pushpa-Rajah A, Duley L.
    Trials; 2017 Apr 26; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 28446203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.
    Houghton G, Kingdon C, Dower M, Shakur-Still H, Alfirevic Z.
    BJOG; 2018 Dec 26; 125(13):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 29911309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy.
    Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Jackson CJ, Windridge K, Pitchforth E.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Apr 26; 15(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16585108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in South Wales.
    Wood F, Prout H, Bayer A, Duncan D, Nuttall J, Hood K, Butler CC, PAAD Study Team.
    Trials; 2013 Aug 09; 14():247. PubMed ID: 23937972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design.
    Richards DA, Ross S, Robens S, Borglin G.
    Trials; 2014 Oct 16; 15():398. PubMed ID: 25318374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study.
    Ditai J, Kanyago J, Nambozo MR, Odeke NM, Abeso J, Dusabe-Richards J, Olupot-Olupot P, Carrol ED, Medina-Lara A, Gladstone M, Storr J, Faragher B, Weeks AD.
    Trials; 2018 Dec 22; 19(1):699. PubMed ID: 30577809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011).
    Moynihan C, Lewis R, Hall E, Jones E, Birtle A, Huddart R, SPARE Trial Management Group.
    Trials; 2012 Nov 29; 13():228. PubMed ID: 23190503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Gillies K, Entwistle V, Treweek SP, Fraser C, Williamson PR, Campbell MK.
    Trials; 2015 Oct 27; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial.
    Smyth RM, Jacoby A, Elbourne D.
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug 27; 28(4):E478-85. PubMed ID: 21944570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.
    Gobat NH, Gal M, Francis NA, Hood K, Watkins A, Turner J, Moore R, Webb SA, Butler CC, Nichol A.
    Trials; 2015 Dec 29; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Health care professionals' views of the factors influencing the decision to refer patients to a stroke rehabilitation trial.
    Thomas N, Plant S, Woodward-Nutt K, Prior Y, Tyson S.
    Trials; 2015 Dec 18; 16():577. PubMed ID: 26680020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses.
    Ulrich CM, Ratcliffe SJ, Hochheimer CJ, Zhou Q, Huang L, Gordon T, Knafl K, Richmond T, Schapira MM, Miller V, Mao JJ, Naylor M, Grady C.
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2024 Dec 18; 15(3):165-177. PubMed ID: 37921867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study.
    Lawton J, White D, Rankin D, Elliott J, Taylor C, Cooper C, Heller S, Hallowell N.
    Trials; 2017 Feb 07; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 28173843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial.
    Tutton E, Achten J, Lamb SE, Willett K, Costa ML, UK WOLLF Research Collaborators.
    Trials; 2018 Jun 25; 19(1):328. PubMed ID: 29941030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
    Perrenoud B, Velonaki VS, Bodenmann P, Ramelet AS.
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct 25; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.
    Gondwe MJ, Toto NM, Gunda C, Gmeiner M, MacCormick IJC, Lalloo D, Parker M, Desmond N.
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Dec 05; 23(1):125. PubMed ID: 36471294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).
    Wade J, Elliott D, Avery KNL, Gaunt D, Young GJ, Barnes R, Paramasivan S, Campbell WB, Blazeby JM, Birtle AJ, Stein RC, Beard DJ, Halliday AW, Donovan JL, ProtecT study group, CLASS study group, Chemorad study group, POUT study group, OPTIMA prelim study group, CSAW study group and ACST-2 study group.
    Trials; 2017 Jul 17; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28716064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.