These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1759 related items for PubMed ID: 27071386
1. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang J, Wu X, Yin P, Guo Q, Hou W, Li Y, Wang Y, Cheng B. Trials; 2016 Apr 12; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses. Dwyer J, Pantanowitz L, Ohori NP, Pai RK, Vrbin C, Brand RE, Monaco SE. Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb 12; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Cheng B, Zhang Y, Chen Q, Sun B, Deng Z, Shan H, Dou L, Wang J, Li Y, Yang X, Jiang T, Xu G, Wang G. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug 12; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. El Chafic AH, Loren D, Siddiqui A, Mounzer R, Cosgrove N, Kowalski T. Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep 12; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, Wang AY, Stelow EB, Shami VM. Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep 12; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles. Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH. BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial. Li SY, Zhou W, Shi L, Ding Z, Yao J, Jiang YP, Gao L, Jiang H, Jin ZD, Wang KX. Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul 29; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY. Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 29; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, Kim HK, Cho JW, Lee TH, Moon JS, Korean EUS Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar 29; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH. Endoscopy; 2014 Dec 29; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. van Riet PA, Larghi A, Attili F, Rindi G, Nguyen NQ, Ruszkiewicz A, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Aslanian H, Farrell J, Robert M, Adeniran A, Van Der Merwe S, Roskams T, Chang K, Lin F, Lee JG, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone M, Doglioni C, Iglesias-Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Giovannini M, Bories E, Poizat F, Santo E, Scapa E, Marmor S, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, Heimann A, Wu M, Baldaque-Silva F, Moro CF, Erler NS, Biermann K, Poley JW, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ. Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb 29; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors. Han JP, Lee TH, Hong SJ, Kim HK, Noh HM, Lee YN, Choi HJ. J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep 29; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study. Hedenström P, Demir A, Khodakaram K, Nilsson O, Sadik R. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb 29; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang Y, Chen Q, Wang J, Wu X, Duan Y, Yin P, Guo Q, Hou W, Cheng B. Trials; 2018 Jan 17; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 29343303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Endoscopy; 2017 Oct 17; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial. Di Mitri R, Mocciaro F, Antonini F, Scimeca D, Conte E, Bonaccorso A, Scibetta N, Unti E, Fornelli A, Giorgini S, Binda C, Macarri G, Larghi A, Fabbri C. Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb 17; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]