These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

532 related items for PubMed ID: 27075860

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J, Aguilar Sánchez V, Bravo Paredes EA, Pinto Valdivia J, Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J.
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016 Jan 04; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 26; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 26; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H.
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 15; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y, Shen J, Zhang F, Zhou X, Tang Z, You T.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan 01; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep 01; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Uysal Y, Babus SB, Kose A, Ates F, Biricik S, Erdogan S, Cevik I, Toker I, Ayrik C.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug 01; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 01; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S, Köse A, Arslan ED, Erdoğan S, Üçbilek E, Çevik İ, Ayrık C, Sezgin O.
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec 30; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 28; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
    Aluizio CLS, Montes CG, Reis GFSR, Nagasako CK.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021 Jul 28; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Taslidere B, Sonmez E, Özcan AB, Mehmetaj L, Keskin EB, Gulen B.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul 28; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX, Liu N, Yang LB, Wei ZC, Xiao CL, Song YH, Wang JH.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec 07; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.