These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
572 related items for PubMed ID: 27106162
1. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, Carnero M, Gracia JL, Ayala JL, Alvarez R, Yuste J. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, Chung F. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study. Chen MK, Hsu HT, Lu IC, Shih CK, Shen YC, Tseng KY, Cheng KI. BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Jan; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G. BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May 01; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children. Aydogmus MT, Eksioglu B, Oba S, Unsal O, Türk HS, Sinikoglu SN, Tug A. Braz J Anesthesiol; 2013 May 01; 63(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 24565340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients. Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL. Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr 01; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG. Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb 01; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia-A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study. Bhushan D, Nandkumar S, Butani M. Asian J Anesthesiol; 2022 Mar 01; 60():. PubMed ID: 35279972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery. Liew GH, Yu ED, Shah SS, Kothandan H. Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug 01; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the third-generation streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA-3G) with the laryngeal mask airway supreme for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. Fan H, Li L, Zhu L, Yi Z, Diao Y. BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Apr 05; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 35382763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery]. Shi YB, Zuo MZ, Du XH, Yu Z. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul 02; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery. Gill RK, Tarat A, Pathak D, Dutta S. Anesth Essays Res; 2017 Jul 02; 11(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28298751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study. Oba S, Turk HS, Isil CT, Erdogan H, Sayin P, Dokucu AI. BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep 05; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway during Cholecystectomy. Hoşten T, Yıldız TŞ, Kuş A, Solak M, Toker K. Balkan Med J; 2012 Sep 05; 29(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 25207022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation. Sood S, Chahar S, Thakur A, Gupta M, Saxena A, Subramanian S. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Sep 05; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management]. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Heuer J, Braun U, Graf BM, Russo SG. Anaesthesist; 2008 Oct 05; 57(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 18712321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep 05; 37(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 19775047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Maitra S, Baidya DK, Arora MK, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P. J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep 05; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]