These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

368 related items for PubMed ID: 27146702

  • 1. Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Slomka V, Van Meerbeek B, Teughels W, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(8):875-81. PubMed ID: 27146702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of Antimicrobial Peptide GH12 on the Cariogenic Properties and Composition of a Cariogenic Multispecies Biofilm.
    Jiang W, Wang Y, Luo J, Li X, Zhou X, Li W, Zhang L.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec 15; 84(24):. PubMed ID: 30341079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The impact of glass ionomer cement and composite resin on microscale pH in cariogenic biofilms and demineralization of dental tissues.
    Schlafer S, Bornmann T, Paris S, Göstemeyer G.
    Dent Mater; 2021 Oct 15; 37(10):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 34419256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Ungureanu AA, Slomka V, Bartic C, Vananroye A, Clasen C, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug 15; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. No evidence for the growth-stimulating effect of monomers on cariogenic Streptococci.
    Nedeljkovic I, Yoshihara K, De Munck J, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun 15; 21(5):1861-1869. PubMed ID: 27766489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Gama-Teixeira A, Simionato MR, Elian SN, Sobral MA, Luz MA.
    Braz Oral Res; 2007 Jun 15; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP, Zanin IC, Lima JP, Vasconcelos SM, Melo MA, Beltrão HC, Rodrigues LK.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan 01; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of Vital Tooth Bleaching on Surface Roughness and Streptococcal Biofilm Formation on Direct Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials.
    Wongpraparatana I, Matangkasombut O, Thanyasrisung P, Panich M.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Jan 01; 43(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 28976842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of fluoride-releasing restorative materials on bacteria-induced pH fall at the bacteria-material interface: an in vitro model study.
    Mayanagi G, Igarashi K, Washio J, Domon-Tawaraya H, Takahashi N.
    J Dent; 2014 Jan 01; 42(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 24246685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro.
    Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B.
    Caries Res; 2002 Jan 01; 36(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12037366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins.
    Beyth N, Domb AJ, Weiss EI.
    J Dent; 2007 Mar 01; 35(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16996674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on Streptococcus mutans biofilm.
    Kelten OS, Hepdeniz OK, Tuncer Y, Kankaya DA, Gurdal O.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jul 01; 23(7):957-964. PubMed ID: 32620725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY, Zhu LK, Li MY, Wang J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov 01; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D.
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar 01; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Potential effects of Psidium sp., Mangifera sp., Mentha sp. and its mixture (PEM) in reducing bacterial populations in biofilms, adherence and acid production of S. sanguinis and S. mutans.
    Shafiei Z, Rahim ZHA, Philip K, Thurairajah N, Yaacob H.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan 01; 109():104554. PubMed ID: 31563709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The formation of cariogenic plaque to contemporary adhesive restorative materials: an in vitro study.
    Lehrkinder A, Rydholm O, Wänström A, Nakamura K, Örtengren U.
    Odontology; 2024 Oct 01; 112(4):1090-1102. PubMed ID: 38502470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties.
    Hahnel S, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Brambilla E.
    J Dent; 2017 May 01; 60():14-24. PubMed ID: 28212980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.