These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


524 related items for PubMed ID: 27149268

  • 1. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N, Hoen M, Truy E, Gallego S.
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Morgon A.
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Mar; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A, O'Driscoll M, Stapleton E, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Munro KJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wei CG, Wang Y, Li H.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov 07; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB, Chambers And RD, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec 07; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
    Bonne NX, Douchement D, Hosana G, Desruelles J, Fayoux P, Ruzza I, Vincent C.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May 07; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant.
    Gallégo S, Truy E, Morgon A, Collet L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Mar 07; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 9105440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Deniz B, Kara E, Polat Z, Deniz R, Ataş A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb 07; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The prognostic value of promontory electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Nikolopoulos TP, Mason SM, Gibbin KP, O'Donoghue GM.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun 07; 21(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10890732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 07; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun 07; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr 07; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The relationship between electrical auditory brainstem responses and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic® SP cochlear implant users.
    Guenser G, Laudanski J, Phillipon B, Backus BC, Bordure P, Romanet P, Parietti-Winkler C.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan 07; 16(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24855994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep 07; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.