These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 271716

  • 1. Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator.
    Winstanley RB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Dec; 38(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 271716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N, Hatano Y, Kolling JN, Clayton JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y, Kolling JN, Stern N, Clayton JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph.
    Curtis DA, Sorensen JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Apr; 55(4):427-9. PubMed ID: 3457176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of mandibular movements recorded by two pantographs.
    Donaldson K, Clayton JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jan; 55(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 3456048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
    Pelletier LB, Campbell SD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
    Chang WS, Romberg E, Driscoll CF, Tabacco MJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of skeletal pattern on determining articulator settings for prosthodontic rehabilitation: an in vivo study.
    Canning T, O'Connell BC, Houston F, O'Sullivan M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 24(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 21209997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new semiadjustable articulator. Part III. An investigation of the capability of the Hanau XP-51 articulator.
    Finger IM, Tanaka H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Mar; 37(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 264967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB, Bannerman RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mandibular movement recordings and articulator adjustments simplified.
    Lundeen HC.
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 285900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The articulator as a dental instrument, not a dental philosophy.
    DePietro AJ.
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):213-29. PubMed ID: 285899
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.
    Mandilaris CB, Beard CC, Clayton JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 1507096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ, Setchell DJ, Tredwin CJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.