These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

42 related items for PubMed ID: 2717344

  • 1. Effects of time-compression on feature and frequency discrimination in aged listeners.
    Rastatter M, Watson M, Strauss-Simmons D.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Apr; 68(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 2717344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identification of time-compressed sentential stimuli by good vs poor readers.
    Watson M, Stewart M, Krause K, Rastatter M.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Aug; 71(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 2235248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of time compression on the auditory processing abilities of learning disabled children.
    Watson MM, Rastatter MP.
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 3842841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of time compression on feature discrimination as a function of age.
    May MM, Rastatter MP, Simmons F.
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 6545539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM, Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J, Tarver K.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Processing of fast speech by elderly listeners.
    Janse E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2361-73. PubMed ID: 19354410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
    Tajima K, Kato H, Rothwell A, Akahane-Yamada R, Munhall KG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):397-413. PubMed ID: 18177169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Fitzgerald MB, Shapiro WH, McDonald PD, Neuburger HS, Ashburn-Reed S, Immerman S, Jethanamest D, Roland JT, Svirsky MA.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 3.