These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

264 related items for PubMed ID: 27174406

  • 1. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods.
    Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 27174406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET, Güncü MB, Aktaş G, Aslan Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S, Pirmoazen S, Beyabanaki E, Rostami M, Alikhasi M.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS, Sun J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of glazing and aging on the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using additive and subtractive techniques.
    Toksoy D, Önöral Ö.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):658.e1-658.e9. PubMed ID: 38342643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study.
    Kahramanoğlu E, Kulak-Özkan Y.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):608-17. PubMed ID: 23725094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of build orientation on adaptation of casting patterns for three-unit partial fixed dental prostheses fabricated by using digital light projection.
    Chaiamornsup P, Iwasaki N, Tsuchida Y, Takahashi H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 33648796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
    Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT, Ramos V.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
    Zeller S, Guichet D, Kontogiorgos E, Nagy WW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H, Kılınç HI, Albayrak H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E, Vojdani M, Torabi K, Khaledi AA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.