These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

737 related items for PubMed ID: 27179440

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL, Gray KM, Quiner TE, Bodea Braescu A, Gerkin R, Perlow JH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sharma C, Sharma S, Soni A.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
    Saccone G, De Angelis MC, Zizolfi B, Gragnano E, Musone M, Zullo F, Bifulco G, Di Spiezio Sardo A.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100592. PubMed ID: 35131497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T.
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C, Verma A, Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.