These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

534 related items for PubMed ID: 27180224

  • 1. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER, Kenton K, Anger JT, Bresee C, Tarnay C.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E, Boulus S, Lauterbach R, Amit A, Weiner Z, Lowenstein L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG, Jacobs KM, Mueller ER, Abernethy MG, Kenton KS.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E, Mearini L, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Nunzi E, di Biase M, Porena M.
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL, Chen CH, Chang SJ.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG, Toler AJ, Triaca V.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient Preferences for Abdominal Incisions Used for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
    Noor N, Rahimi S, Pereira E, Treszezamsky A, Garely A, Vardy M, Ascher-Walsh C.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 21(6):348-54. PubMed ID: 26506164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E, Ditonno P, Giannitsas K, De Rienzo G, Bini V, Costantini E.
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Kenton K, Mueller ER, Tarney C, Bresee C, Anger JT.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 27403758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe K, Rosenman A, Brubaker L, Bresee C, Kenton K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24463657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, Visco AG, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M, Thubert T, Lefranc JP, Vaessen C, Chartier-Kastler É, Deffieux X, Rouprêt M.
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Alas AN, Anger JT.
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR, Roh AM, Jeong K, Kim SH, Chae HD, Moon HS.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.