These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 27183064

  • 41. Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Pinés-Hueso J, Ellakuria-Echebarria J.
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2107027. PubMed ID: 27822468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Effect of Sandblasting and Type of Cement on the Bond Strength of Molar Bands on Stainless Steel Crowns.
    Bawazir OA, Elaraby A, Alshamrani H, Salama FS.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 26349792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
    Kalla K, Arunachalam S, Behera SSP, Konchada J, Lankapalli S, Vanisetti L.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec 01; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P, Alius J, Fischer C, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec 01; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
    Jimenez RA, Vargas-Koudriavtsev T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Dec 01; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH, Han CH, Kim S.
    J Dent; 2012 Oct 01; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative In-Vitro study.
    Aladag A, Sahan MH, Akkus NO, Aktas R.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug 01; 23(8):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 32788484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO, Kelly JR, Zandparsa R.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec 01; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
    de Campos TN, Adachi LK, Miashiro K, Yoshida H, Shinkai RS, Neto PT, Frigerio ML.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug 01; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Comparison of the Effect of Implant Abutment Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Khan MAA, Godil AZ, Wadwan SA, Kheur MG.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr 24; 39(2):278-285. PubMed ID: 38657220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.