These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 27185389

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis E.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26474933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF, Grempel RG, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Demircan S, Uretürk EU, Apaydın A, Şen S.
    Biomed Res Int; 2020 Apr; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Hotta A, Tsutsui T, Fukaya K, Hiraide R, Takayama A, Tsunoda T, Saito Y, Baba N, Sato M.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1788-1793. PubMed ID: 28927955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Analysis and comparison of clinical results of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy performed with the use of monocortical locking plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
    Kabasawa Y, Sato M, Kikuchi T, Sato Y, Takahashi Y, Higuchi Y, Omura K.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):e333-41. PubMed ID: 22831752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
    Ureturk EU, Apaydin A.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of different hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques on the postoperative stability following a mandibular advancement using a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective three-dimensional comparative study.
    Telha W, Al-Watary MQ, Sakran K, Chen H, Bi R, Zhu S, Jiang N.
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 125(2):101667. PubMed ID: 38738550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY, Hong J, Kim CS, Kim MJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Does Intraoral Miniplate Fixation Have Good Postoperative Stability After Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy? Comparison With Intraoral Bicortical Screw Fixation.
    Matsushita Y, Nakakuki K, Kosugi M, Kurohara K, Harada K.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 26117377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM, Pijpe J, de Lange J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE, Peterson GP, Holms S, Haug RH.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
    Al-Moraissi EA, Ellis E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.
    Al-Watary MQ, Telha WA, Ge H, Wu Y, Sun X, Qing Z, Li J.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 38627189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
    Ueki K, Okabe K, Marukawa K, Mukozawa A, Moroi A, Miyazaki M, Sotobori M, Ishihara Y, Yoshizawa K, Ooi K.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement.
    Hara S, Mitsugi M, Tatemoto Y.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of stabilization of a bilateral sagittal split on orthodontic finishing after mandibular setback: a case for bicortical fixation.
    McHugh M, Van Sickels JE.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e301-9. PubMed ID: 22177807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.