These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 2718970

  • 1. The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical study.
    Op Heij DG, Callaert H, Opdebeeck HM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 2718970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mandibular growth, condyle position and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Gianelly AA, Brosnan P, Martignoni M, Bernstein L.
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 6576652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H, Sandou M, Lin CM, Kamata M, Kawata T.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
    Bolmgren GA, Moshiri F.
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH, Allen LP.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study.
    Abbing A, Koretsi V, Kalavritinos M, Schröder T, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN.
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100863. PubMed ID: 38428369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO, Paulin G.
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT.
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases.
    Rutter RR, Witt E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H, Hägg U.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    De Almeida MR, Henriques JF, Ursi W.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12045763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Condylar growth alterations after functional orthopedic therapy, measured by symmetric axis geometry.
    Vedrenne D.
    J Pedod; 1984 May; 8(4):337-66. PubMed ID: 6594495
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K, Harvold EP.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.