These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 2718970

  • 21. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment. An implant study.
    Williams S, Melsen B.
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Apr; 81(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 6960720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Maxillary displacement with mandibular maxi-propulsion in the treatment of Class II division 1].
    Baldonado H, Rubaldo NA, Ruiz Moreno M.
    Rev Iberoam Ortod; 1985 Oct; 5(2):13-41. PubMed ID: 3915572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3).
    Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNamara JA.
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 2792213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects resulting from the use of a functional appliance with different amounts of protrusive activation.
    DeVincenzo JP, Winn MW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Sep; 96(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 2773861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.
    Hamilton SD, Sinclair PM, Hamilton RH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Nov; 92(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 3479011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A cephalometric study of the construction bite of the activator.
    Hamano Y, Ahlgren J.
    Eur J Orthod; 1987 Nov; 9(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 3480230
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition.
    Tsamtsouris A, Vedrenne D.
    J Pedod; 1983 Nov; 8(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 6584584
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982 Nov; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG.
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Treatment of condylar fracture using a functional appliance in a 6-year-old child.
    Williamson EH.
    Facial Orthop Temporomandibular Arthrol; 1986 Aug; 3(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 3462025
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
    Demirović D, Filipović M.
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989 Nov; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. An evaluation of combination second molar extraction and functional appliance therapy.
    Whitney EF, Sinclair PM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Mar; 91(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 3469904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Induced condylar growth in a patient with hemifacial microsomia.
    Kaplan RG.
    Angle Orthod; 1989 Mar; 59(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 2637677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination appliance.
    Mao J, Zhao H.
    J Tongji Med Univ; 1997 Mar; 17(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 9812793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cephalometric changes in Class II, Division 1 cases after orthopedic treatment with the bioactivator.
    Dahan J, Serhal JB, Englebert A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 2916469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR, Sinclair PM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH.
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Mechanics, growth, and class II corrections.
    Hultgren BW, Isaacson RJ, Erdman AG, Worms FW.
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Oct; 74(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 281141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.