These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

498 related items for PubMed ID: 27195802

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The efficiency of otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone audiometry in the detection of temporary auditory changes after exposure to high sound pressure levels.
    Barros SM, Frota S, Atherino CC, Osterne F.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 18094799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M, Dillon H.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preoperative speech and pure-tone audiometry in four types of patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Morlet T, Dubreuil C, Duclaux R, Ferber-Viart C.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 13130441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties Among Adults With Normal Audiograms: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.
    Tremblay KL, Pinto A, Fischer ME, Klein BE, Klein R, Levy S, Tweed TS, Cruickshanks KJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Sep; 36(6):e290-9. PubMed ID: 26164105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing.
    Engdahl B, Tambs K, Hoffman HJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 23216196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Staud I, Frank G, Dammann F, Plontke S, Plinkert PK.
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Otoacoustic emissions in central auditory disorders.
    Vatovec J.
    Pflugers Arch; 2000 Jul; 439(3 Suppl):R222-4. PubMed ID: 10653200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of occupational noise exposure on tinnitus and sound-induced auditory fatigue among obstetrics personnel: a cross-sectional study.
    Fredriksson S, Hammar O, Torén K, Tenenbaum A, Waye KP.
    BMJ Open; 2015 Mar 27; 5(3):e005793. PubMed ID: 25818267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 27; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec 27; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.