These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

713 related items for PubMed ID: 27196105

  • 1. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D, Woog K, Legras R.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R, Rio D.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
    Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K, Ho A.
    J Optom; 2018 May; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of Number of Zones on Subjective Vision in Concentric Bifocal Optics.
    Legras R, Rio D.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26390354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Image quality in wearers of a centre distance concentric design bifocal contact lens.
    Gispets J, Arjona M, Pujol J.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 May; 22(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 12090637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Through-focus optical characteristics of monofocal and bifocal soft contact lenses across the peripheral visual field.
    Ji Q, Yoo YS, Alam H, Yoon G.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 29691930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.
    Wu Y, Thibos LN, Candy TR.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):432-446. PubMed ID: 29736941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Optical performance of decentered bifocal contact lenses.
    Woods RL, Saunders JE, Port MJ.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Mar; 70(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 8483576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
    Faria-Ribeiro M, Amorim-de-Sousa A, González-Méijome JM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH, Kollbaum P, Meyer D, Bradley A.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.