These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
129 related items for PubMed ID: 27199833
1. Active Motor Training Has Long-term Effects on Infants' Object Exploration. Wiesen SE, Watkins RM, Needham AW. Front Psychol; 2016; 7():599. PubMed ID: 27199833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of brief sticky mittens training that lead to increases in object exploration. Needham AW, Wiesen SE, Hejazi JN, Libertus K, Christopher C. J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():209-224. PubMed ID: 28552388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Brief reaching training with "sticky mittens" in preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial. Nascimento AL, Toledo AM, Merey LF, Tudella E, Soares-Marangoni DA. Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():138-147. PubMed ID: 30537626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sticky mittens, prickly Velcro, and infants' transition into independent reaching: Response to Williams, Corbetta, and Guan (2015). Needham A, Wiesen S, Libertus K. Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():38-42. PubMed ID: 26298544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bare fingers, but no obvious influence of "prickly" Velcro! In the absence of parents' encouragement, it is not clear that "sticky mittens" provide an advantage to the process of learning to reach. Corbetta D, Williams JL, Haynes JM. Infant Behav Dev; 2016 Feb; 42():168-78. PubMed ID: 26142573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning to reach with "sticky" or "non-sticky" mittens: a tale of developmental trajectories. Williams JL, Corbetta D, Guan Y. Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Feb; 38():82-96. PubMed ID: 25636028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A Pre-registered sticky mittens study: active training does not increase reaching and grasping in a swedish context. van den Berg L, Libertus K, Nyström P, Gottwald JM, Licht V, Gredebäck G. Child Dev; 2022 Nov; 93(6):e656-e671. PubMed ID: 36047569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Teach to reach: the effects of active vs. passive reaching experiences on action and perception. Libertus K, Needham A. Vision Res; 2010 Dec; 50(24):2750-7. PubMed ID: 20828580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scaffolded reaching experiences encourage grasping activity in infants at high risk for autism. Libertus K, Landa RJ. Front Psychol; 2014 Dec; 5():1071. PubMed ID: 25295021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced Neural Processing of Goal-directed Actions After Active Training in 4-Month-Old Infants. Bakker M, Sommerville JA, Gredebäck G. J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 28(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 26679217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy. Poulin-Dubois D, Brooker I, Chow V. Adv Child Dev Behav; 2009 Mar; 37():55-104. PubMed ID: 19673160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age? Rakison DH, Krogh L. Dev Sci; 2012 Jan; 15(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 22251291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The joint role of trained, untrained, and observed actions at the origins of goal recognition. Gerson SA, Woodward AL. Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Feb; 37(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 24468646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypical object exploration in infants at-risk for autism during the first year of lifer. Kaur M, Srinivasan SM, Bhat AN. Front Psychol; 2015 Feb; 6():798. PubMed ID: 26136702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]