These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 2720611

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
    Conway BJ, Suleiman OH, Rueter FG, Antonsen RG, Slayton RJ.
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The history and the effect of the mammography quality assurance legislation in Michigan.
    Osuch JR, Camburn JF, Sienko DG, Potchen EJ.
    Cancer; 1994 Jul 01; 74(1 Suppl):263-70. PubMed ID: 8004596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A quality assurance programme for mass screening in mammography.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Dec 01; 12(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 2610641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Strategies for implementation and quality assurance for mammographic screening.
    DeBruhl ND, Farria DM, Bassett LW.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct 01; 4(5):155-9. PubMed ID: 1343948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. American College of Radiology (ACR). Mammography Accreditation Program: Guidelines.
    Wilcox PA.
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1991 Oct 01; 72(1):17. PubMed ID: 2011816
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
    Chakraborty DP, Eckert MP.
    Med Phys; 1995 Feb 01; 22(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7565344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography.
    Verdun FR, Moeckli R, Valley JF, Bochud F, Hessler C.
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug 01; 69(824):762-8. PubMed ID: 8949680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Quality of care and performance improvement.
    McLelland R.
    N C Med J; 2005 Aug 01; 66(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 15786688
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Mammography accreditation and equipment performance.
    Barnes GT, Hendrick RE.
    Radiographics; 1994 Jan 01; 14(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 8128045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Quality assurance in mammography: College of Radiology Survey in Malaysia.
    Ho EL, Ng KH, Wong JH, Wang HB.
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Jun 01; 61(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 16898312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.