These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Jurors report that risk measure scores matter in sexually violent predator trials, but that other factors matter more. Turner DB, Boccaccini MT, Murrie DC, Harris PB. Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 25613035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust. Douard J. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007 Feb; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Policy interventions designed to combat sexual violence: community notification and civil commitment. Levenson JS. J Child Sex Abus; 2003 Feb; 12(3-4):17-52. PubMed ID: 15308446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey. DeMatteo D, Edens JF, Galloway M, Cox J, Smith ST, Formon D. Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory. Ruva CL, Guenther CC. Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]