These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
515 related items for PubMed ID: 27212453
1. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model. Yang Q, Larose C, Della Porta AC, Schultz GS, Gibson DJ. Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A surfactant-based dressing can reduce the appearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pigments and uncover the dermal extracellular matrix in an ex vivo porcine skin wound model. Seo S, Yang Q, Jeong S, Della Porta A, Kapoor H, Gibson DJ. Int Wound J; 2024 Apr; 21(4):e14510. PubMed ID: 38148595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model. Seth AK, Zhong A, Nguyen KT, Hong SJ, Leung KP, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. Wound Repair Regen; 2014 Apr; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A Surfactant-Based Dressing to Treat and Prevent Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilms. Yang Q, Schultz GS, Gibson DJ. J Burn Care Res; 2018 Aug 17; 39(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 29931339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants. Phillips PL, Yang Q, Davis S, Sampson EM, Azeke JI, Hamad A, Schultz GS. Int Wound J; 2015 Aug 17; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preclinical evaluation of a novel silver gelling fiber dressing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a porcine wound infection model. Davis SC, Li J, Gil J, Head C, Valdes J, Glinos GD, Solis M, Higa A, Pastar I. Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul 17; 27(4):360-365. PubMed ID: 30920083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The ability of a colloidal silver gel wound dressing to kill bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Tran PL, Huynh E, Hamood AN, de Souza A, Mehta D, Moeller KW, Moeller CD, Morgan M, Reid TW. J Wound Care; 2017 Apr 01; 26(sup4):S16-S24. PubMed ID: 28379105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING. Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler IP. Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar 01; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control. Percival SL, Mayer D, Salisbury AM. Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep 01; 25(5):767-773. PubMed ID: 28857343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo. Fitzgerald DJ, Renick PJ, Forrest EC, Tetens SP, Earnest DN, McMillan J, Kiedaisch BM, Shi L, Roche ED. Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan 01; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel murine model for delayed wound healing using a biological wound dressing with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Brandenburg KS, Calderon DF, Kierski PR, Czuprynski CJ, McAnulty JF. Microb Pathog; 2018 Sep 01; 122():30-38. PubMed ID: 29842898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo. Johani K, Malone M, Jensen SO, Dickson HG, Gosbell IB, Hu H, Yang Q, Schultz G, Vickery K. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2018 Feb 01; 73(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 29165561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo. Roche ED, Woodmansey EJ, Yang Q, Gibson DJ, Zhang H, Schultz GS. Int Wound J; 2019 Jun 01; 16(3):674-683. PubMed ID: 30868761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric Field Based Dressing Disrupts Mixed-Species Bacterial Biofilm Infection and Restores Functional Wound Healing. Barki KG, Das A, Dixith S, Ghatak PD, Mathew-Steiner S, Schwab E, Khanna S, Wozniak DJ, Roy S, Sen CK. Ann Surg; 2019 Apr 01; 269(4):756-766. PubMed ID: 29099398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model. Pati BA, Kurata WE, Horseman TS, Pierce LM. Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar 01; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing. Scully R, Hurlow J, Walker M, Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P. J Wound Care; 2018 Sep 02; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with periodic instillation using antimicrobial solutions on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants. Phillips PL, Yang Q, Schultz GS. Int Wound J; 2013 Dec 02; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):48-55. PubMed ID: 24251844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Glycoside Hydrolase PslG Combats Wound Infection by Improving Antibiotic Efficacy and Host Innate Immune Activity. Pestrak MJ, Baker P, Dellos-Nolan S, Hill PJ, Passos da Silva D, Silver H, Lacdao I, Raju D, Parsek MR, Wozniak DJ, Howell PL. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2019 Jun 02; 63(6):. PubMed ID: 30988141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gram-negative wound pathogens. Miller KG, Tran PL, Haley CL, Kruzek C, Colmer-Hamood JA, Myntti M, Hamood AN. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014 Jun 02; 58(6):3060-72. PubMed ID: 24637684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]