These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

102 related items for PubMed ID: 2721828

  • 1. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Hannley MT, Dankowski K, Smith L, McCandless G.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2721828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Moore BC, Kuk FK.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):887-911. PubMed ID: 2601319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative speech recognition results in eight subjects using two different coding strategies with the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant.
    von Wallenberg EL, Battmer RD.
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Dec; 25(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 1773197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Roland JT.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception.
    Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, Dettman SJ, Clark GM, Busby PA, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Rickards FW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):401-17. PubMed ID: 1573879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.