These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 27226284

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H, Yamanaka N.
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A retractable winged steel (butterfly) needle performance improvement project.
    Hotaling M.
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2009 Feb; 35(2):100-5, 61. PubMed ID: 19241730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G, De Carli G, Puro V, Petrosillo N, Arici C, Bertucci R, Bianciardi L, Bonazzi L, Cestrone A, Daglio M.
    JAMA; 2009 Feb; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Costs associated with sharps injuries in the Swedish health care setting and potential cost savings from needle-stick prevention devices with needle and syringe.
    Glenngård AH, Persson U.
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2009 Feb; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 19229763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers.
    Valls V, Lozano MS, Yánez R, Martínez MJ, Pascual F, Lloret J, Ruiz JA.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1352-60. PubMed ID: 17994515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Model-Based Product Evaluation Protocol for Comparison of Safety-Engineered Protection Mechanisms of Winged Blood Collection Needles.
    Haupt C, Spaeth J, Ahne T, Goebel U, Steinmann D.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 May; 37(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 26868306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ballout RA, Diab B, Harb AC, Tarabay R, Khamassi S, Akl EA.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep 01; 16():458. PubMed ID: 27581947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
    Tosini W, Ciotti C, Goyer F, Lolom I, L'Hériteau F, Abiteboul D, Pellissier G, Bouvet E.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr 01; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.
    Dulon M, Stranzinger J, Wendeler D, Nienhaus A.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov 24; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33255337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.