These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


284 related items for PubMed ID: 27250152

  • 1. Can the elongated hindwing tails of fluttering moths serve as false sonar targets to divert bat attacks?
    Lee WJ, Moss CF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2579. PubMed ID: 27250152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Wingtip folds and ripples on saturniid moths create decoy echoes against bat biosonar.
    Neil TR, Kennedy EE, Harris BJ, Holderied MW.
    Curr Biol; 2021 Nov 08; 31(21):4824-4830.e3. PubMed ID: 34506731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The evolution of anti-bat sensory illusions in moths.
    Rubin JJ, Hamilton CA, McClure CJW, Chadwell BA, Kawahara AY, Barber JR.
    Sci Adv; 2018 Jul 08; 4(7):eaar7428. PubMed ID: 29978042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.
    Barber JR, Leavell BC, Keener AL, Breinholt JW, Chadwell BA, McClure CJ, Hill GM, Kawahara AY.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar 03; 112(9):2812-6. PubMed ID: 25730869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?
    Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Hristov NI, Conner WE.
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Jul 15; 214(Pt 14):2416-25. PubMed ID: 21697434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion.
    Salles A, Diebold CA, Moss CF.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov 17; 117(46):29229-29238. PubMed ID: 33139550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The influence of bat echolocation call duration and timing on auditory encoding of predator distance in noctuoid moths.
    Gordon SD, Ter Hofstede HM.
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Mar 22; 221(Pt 6):. PubMed ID: 29567831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Acoustic camouflage increases with body size and changes with bat echolocation frequency range in a community of nocturnally active Lepidoptera.
    Simon R, Dreissen A, Leroy H, Berg MP, Halfwerk W.
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec 22; 92(12):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 37882060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. High duty cycle moth sounds jam bat echolocation: bats counter with compensatory changes in buzz duration.
    Fernández Y, Dowdy NJ, Conner WE.
    J Exp Biol; 2022 Sep 15; 225(18):. PubMed ID: 36111562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.
    Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH.
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec 15; 208(Pt 24):4689-98. PubMed ID: 16326950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High duty cycle echolocation and prey detection by bats.
    Lazure L, Fenton MB.
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Apr 01; 214(Pt 7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 21389198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.
    Cobo-Cuan A, Kössl M, Mora EC.
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Sep 01; 203(9):707-715. PubMed ID: 28421281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.
    Kawahara AY, Barber JR.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May 19; 112(20):6407-12. PubMed ID: 25941377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.