These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 27250153

  • 1. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E, Brand T, van de Par S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S, van de Par S, Schoenmaker E.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intelligibility for Binaural Speech with Discarded Low-SNR Speech Components.
    Schoenmaker E, van de Par S.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 894():73-81. PubMed ID: 27080648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B, Lavandier M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS, Iyer N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF, Mansell ER.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Ihlefeld A, Litovsky RY.
    PLoS One; 2012 Mar; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H, Buchholz JM, Dillon H, Cameron S, Hickson L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M, Fallah A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The role of reliable interaural time difference cues in ambiguous binaural signals for the intelligibility of multitalker speech.
    Schoenmaker E, van de Par S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4041. PubMed ID: 32611159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F, Yoho SE, Youngdahl CL, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T, Lavandier M, Deroche MLD.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of a consistent target or masker voice on target speech intelligibility in two- and three-talker mixtures.
    Samson F, Johnsrude IS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 27036241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ, Bailey PJ, Roberts B.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B, Buchholz JM, Morgan C, Sharma M, Weller T, Konganda SA, Shirai K, Kawano A.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Aug; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K, Rosen S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J, Mason CR, Streeter TM, Best V, Roverud E, Kidd G.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug 03; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.