These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 27250197

  • 1. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
    Donai JJ, Jennings MB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD, Galvin JJ, Free RH, Başkent D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K, Sharma M, Ibrahim RK, Mandikal Vasuki PR.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J, Bidelman GM.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D, Gaudrain E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
    Deroche MLD, Limb CJ, Chatterjee M, Gracco VL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Vowel and tone recognition in quiet and in noise among Mandarin-speaking amusics.
    Tang W, Wang XJ, Li JQ, Liu C, Dong Q, Nan Y.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():62-69. PubMed ID: 29534831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L, Tao S, Wang W, Dong Q, Jin SH, Liu C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY, Lekich A, Zhang Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
    Lee CY, Zhang Y, Li X, Tao L, Bond ZS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Enhanced auditory temporal gap detection in listeners with musical training.
    Mishra SK, Panda MR, Herbert C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL173-8. PubMed ID: 25096143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C, Jin SH.
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing musicians and non-musicians in signal-in-noise perception.
    Zhang F, Roland C, Rasul D, Cahn S, Liang C, Valencia G.
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):717-723. PubMed ID: 31187671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.