These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

414 related items for PubMed ID: 2729036

  • 1. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM.
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
    Rubio CA.
    Acta Cytol; 1977 Jun; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D, Dahl MB, Hølund B.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun 02; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of endocervical status on the cytologic prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Mitchell H, Medley G.
    Acta Cytol; 1992 Jun 02; 36(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1449025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Modified endocervical vaginal smear for diagnosis of endocervical microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
    Melsheimer P, Hahn U, Herberling D, Wallwiener D, Rummel HH, Bastert G.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995 Jun 02; 117(11):608-10. PubMed ID: 8533497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Evaluation of the agreement between cytological and histological examinations in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
    Kujawska E, Waszyński E.
    Wiad Lek; 1981 Aug 01; 34(15):1263-6. PubMed ID: 7331327
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
    Homesley HD.
    Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep 01; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.
    Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG.
    Acta Cytol; 1983 Sep 01; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Sep 01; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ, Cordes A, Regidor M, Maier E, Flenker H.
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007 Sep 01; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.