These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

559 related items for PubMed ID: 27295907

  • 1. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
    Dobrosavljević A, Rakić S, Nikoli B, Raznatović SJ, Dikić SD, Milosević Z, Jurisić A, Skrobić M.
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R.
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
    Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, Schmidt W, Degenhardt F.
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
    Bicchierai G, Nori J, De Benedetto D, Boeri C, Vanzi E, Bianchi S, Kaur Gill M, Cirone D, Miele V.
    Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
    Elverici E, Barça AN, Aktaş H, Özsoy A, Zengin B, Çavuşoğlu M, Araz L.
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015 Feb; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
    Hsu HH, Chang TH, Chou YC, Peng YJ, Ko KH, Chang WC, Lin YP, Hsu GC, Yu JC.
    Breast J; 2015 Feb; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
    Teifke A, Vomweg TW, Hlawatsch A, Nasresfahani A, Kern A, Victor A, Schmidt M, Bittinger F, Düber C.
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
    Giess CS, Smeglin LZ, Meyer JE, Ritner JA, Birdwell RL.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses.
    Koning JL, Davenport KP, Poole PS, Kruk PG, Grabowski JE.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
    Chiorean AR, Duma MM, Dudea SM, Bolboaca S, Dumitriu D, Eniu D, Sfrangeu SA.
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions.
    Reinikainen HT, Rissanen TJ, Piippo UK, Päivänsalo MJ.
    Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 10394865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization.
    Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, Morris EA, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 11517048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
    Kim H, Cha JH, Oh HY, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Chae EY.
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
    Obenauer S, Sohns C, Werner C, Grabbe E.
    Breast J; 2006 Jul; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
    Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, Jordan L, Baker L, Thompson A.
    Breast Cancer Res; 2010 Jul; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
    Gao JX, Yu XQ, Yao LH.
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
    Stehouwer BL, Merckel LG, Verkooijen HM, Peters NH, Mann RM, Duvivier KM, Mali WP, Peeters PH, Veldhuis WB, van den Bosch MA.
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided?
    Guo Y, Raghu M, Durand M, Hooley R.
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
    Shen WC, Chang RF, Moon WK.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.