These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
339 related items for PubMed ID: 27353098
1. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer]. Liu R, Wang Y, Xiong W, Zhang Z, Deng H, Li G. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Wang Y, Deng H, Mou T, Li J, Liu H, Zhou H, Li G. Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):840-848. PubMed ID: 30006846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer. Liu X, Li JB, Shi G, Guo R, Zhang R. World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov 10; 16(1):220. PubMed ID: 30414613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction]. Gao GM, Liu DN, Li TY. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec 25; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preliminary experience of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. Lin T, Yu J, Hu Y, Liu H, Lu Y, Zhao M, Chen H, Chen X, Li G. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan 25; 22(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 30703792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method]. Wu X, Sun LD, Wang M, Zhang P, Yang ZL, Liang H, Tao KX, Cao H, Xu WT. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep 25; 23(9):888-895. PubMed ID: 32927514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method]. Xu S, Zhang H. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug 25; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Zhang H, Ling Y, Cong J, Cui M, Liu D, Chen C. World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct 26; 14(1):275. PubMed ID: 27784311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer]. Li Z, Shi Y, Zhao Y, Qian F, Hao Y, Tang B, Luo H, Wan Y, Yu P. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May 26; 19(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 27215520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang KC, Chang KJ, Shieh MJ, Jeng YM, Wang SM. World J Surg; 2003 Feb 26; 27(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 12616435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Song Z, Li Y, Liu K, Jiang Y, Shi Y, Ji X, Zhang T, Wu H, Shi Y, Zhao R. Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr 26; 33(4):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 30043168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]