These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
115 related items for PubMed ID: 2735566
21. In vitro activity of ceftaroline (PPI-0903M, T-91825) against bacteria with defined resistance mechanisms and phenotypes. Mushtaq S, Warner M, Ge Y, Kaniga K, Livermore DM. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Aug; 60(2):300-11. PubMed ID: 17548456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Novel antibacterial activity of monolaurin compared with conventional antibiotics against organisms from skin infections: an in vitro study. Carpo BG, Verallo-Rowell VM, Kabara J. J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 6(10):991-8. PubMed ID: 17966176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [In vitro antibacterial activity of dibekacin on staphylococci, streptococci and aerobic Gram negative bacilli]. Deforges L, Van Thoi J, Le Soussy CJ, Duval J. Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Nov 18; 11(46):3385-90. PubMed ID: 7155845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Activity of cephamandole against some gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci. Dzierzanowska D, Jakubicz P, Niedźwiecka M, Borowski J. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1980 Nov 18; 28(3):389-91. PubMed ID: 6969585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicentre study of the in vitro activity of cefepime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, compared to other broad-spectrum agents. Bell JM, Turnidge JD, Cefepime Study Group. Pathology; 2001 Feb 18; 33(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11280610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Susceptibility in vitro to certain quinolines of gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive cocci causing urinary tract infections]. Mróz E, Jankowski S, Bartelmus J, Grzybek-Hryncewicz K, Ruczkowska J, Starek J, Boratyńska M. Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1993 Feb 18; 45(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 8231429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro brodimoprim activity on nosocomial bacterial strains. Nicoletti P, Novelli A, Periti P. J Chemother; 1993 Dec 18; 5(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 8195834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative study of the in-vitro activity of cefepime and other cephalosporins. Lim VK, Halijah MY. Malays J Pathol; 1993 Jun 18; 15(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8277793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial mixtures using agar dilution technique. Athar MA. Am J Med Technol; 1980 Feb 18; 46(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6986770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Short communication: Determination of methicillin resistance in staphylococci with different methods and detection of multiple antibiotic resistance]. Cetinkol Y, Altindiş M, Cetinkaya Z, Aktepe OC. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Jan 18; 42(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 18444569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Intravenous catheter infections associated with bacteraemia: a 2-year study in a university hospital. Paragioudaki M, Stamouli V, Kolonitsiou F, Anastassiou ED, Dimitracopoulos G, Spiliopoulou I. Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 May 18; 10(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 15113321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Rapid ATB staph: 4-hour antibiotic sensitivity test of staphylococci. Description and performance]. Gayral JP, Albertini MT, Gallice E, Olléon M. Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 May 18; 34(5):364-7. PubMed ID: 3534707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Evaluation of the API ATB-CMI system for testing the sensitivity of Haemophilus influenzae to antibiotics. Comparison with other technics and reflections on interpretation criteria]. Dabernat H, Delmas C, Lareng MB. Pathol Biol (Paris); 1986 Jun 18; 34(5 Pt 2):616-20. PubMed ID: 3534755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparison of 2 rapid systems for evaluating the sensitivity to antibiotics of 170 strains of Enterobacteriaceae: the Rapid ATB and the Autobac]. Enoch F, Freney J, Combe P, Nervi C, Fleurette J. Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1986 Jun 18; 44(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 3813135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Doripenem (S-4661), a novel carbapenem: comparative activity against contemporary pathogens including bactericidal action and preliminary in vitro methods evaluations. Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ, Fritsche TR, Sader HS. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Jul 18; 54(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 15190031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparative in vitro activity of 2 monobactams (RO 172301 (AMA 1080)and aztreonam), ceftazidime and cefotaxime on Gram-negative bacilli]. Thabaut A, Meyran M, Huerre M. Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May 18; 33(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 3929217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Antibiotic sensitivity of enterobacteriaceae by disc diffusion and rapid fermentation sensitivity test methods. Joshi PJ, Samuel A, Dongre DS, Sutaria SN. Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1989 Jul 18; 32(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 2777349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization and anti-microbial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria isolated from bloodstream infections of cancer patients on chemotherapy in Pakistan. Saghir S, Faiz M, Saleem M, Younus A, Aziz H. Indian J Med Microbiol; 2009 Jul 18; 27(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19736404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of medium composition on bacterial susceptibility testing to gentamicin and netilmicin. Dornbusch K. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1980 Jul 18; Suppl 23():46-53. PubMed ID: 6937968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]