These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

907 related items for PubMed ID: 27372195

  • 1. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul 25; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Brener MI, Bush A, Miller JM, Hasan RK.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec 01; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
    Pandie S, Mehta SR, Cantor WJ, Cheema AN, Gao P, Madan M, Niemela K, Rao SV, Schwalm JD, Valentin V, Velianou JL, Jolly SS.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr 20; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Procedural Outcomes With Femoral, Radial, Distal Radial, and Ulnar Access for Coronary Angiography: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Maqsood MH, Yong CM, Rao SV, Cohen MG, Pancholy S, Bangalore S.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Sep 20; 17(9):e014186. PubMed ID: 39027936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
    Lee MS, Wolfe M, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov 20; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Combined Use of Bivalirudin and Radial Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes Is Not Superior to the Use of Either One Separately: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Mina GS, Gobrial GF, Modi K, Dominic P.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug 08; 9(15):1523-31. PubMed ID: 27491601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
    Porto I, Bolognese L, Dudek D, Goldstein P, Hamm C, Tanguay JF, Ten Berg J, Widimský P, Le Gall N, Zagar AJ, LeNarz LA, Miller D, Montalescot G, ACCOAST Investigators.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May 09; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Radial Access Reduces Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From an Updated Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Andò G, Capodanno D.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr 11; 9(7):660-70. PubMed ID: 27056303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.
    Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, Zahran ME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr 18; 4(4):CD012318. PubMed ID: 29665617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
    Gargiulo G, Ariotti S, Vranckx P, Leonardi S, Frigoli E, Ciociano N, Tumscitz C, Tomassini F, Calabrò P, Garducci S, Crimi G, Andò G, Ferrario M, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Russo F, Garbo R, Ausiello A, Zavalloni D, Sardella G, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro MS, Zingarelli A, Petronio AS, Windecker S, da Costa BR, Valgimigli M.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan 08; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
    Roule V, Lemaitre A, Sabatier R, Lognoné T, Dahdouh Z, Berger L, Milliez P, Grollier G, Montalescot G, Beygui F.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov 08; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Radial vs femoral access for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronary angiography or intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andò G, Gragnano F, Calabrò P, Valgimigli M.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec 01; 92(7):E518-E526. PubMed ID: 30244540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.